| Criteria |
Poor |
Moderate |
Excellent |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| Relevance: Addresses ideas, topics, or practices that are highly relevant and significant to teaching and learning at the university level. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Evidence: Cites previous scholarly work and integrates theory and/or quantitative or qualitative assessment data. The presentation does not rest on the presenter’s experience. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Action: Offers content applicable to a variety of disciplines and campus sizes by sharing innovative and creative thinking. Proposal covers new ground or is a significant advancement or application of well-documented practice. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Appropriate: The session proposal is likely to accomplish the stated outcomes. It is appropriate for the track selected by the presenter. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Presentation: The session is engaging and interactive. It includes the thoughtful use of active learning and engagement activities synergistic with the proposed content and session goals. |
|
|
|
|
|
